Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better
Posted by Amit on October 27, 2013 at 03:53:37:

Brain/Roger
1) It is mentioned several times (even on this forum) that dates 12/13 meant 12th Noon to 13th Noon UTC.There was no ambiguty
2)The dates were given eariler also.You can not take my 6+ dates for 6.5+ quake.The 6.5+ quakes dates predicted can be posted here if space permits.This could be not more than 150
Amit

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Skywise  04:39:56 - 10/27/2013  (101183)  (1)
        ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit  06:53:20 - 10/27/2013  (101184)  (1)
           ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Roger Hunter  09:05:19 - 10/27/2013  (101185)  (1)
              ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit  10:44:35 - 10/27/2013  (101186)  (2)
                 ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Skywise  16:30:29 - 10/27/2013  (101189)  (0)
                 ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter  14:27:06 - 10/27/2013  (101188)  (1)
                    ● Re: File requested - Amit  22:48:00 - 10/27/2013  (101192)  (1)
                       ● Re: File requested - Amit  10:31:30 - 10/28/2013  (101194)  (1)
                          ● Re: File requested - Amit  10:51:00 - 10/28/2013  (101195)  (1)
                             ● Re: File requested - Amit  12:30:11 - 10/28/2013  (101196)  (1)
                                ● Re: File requested - Amit  12:41:16 - 10/28/2013  (101197)  (1)
                                   ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter  13:37:38 - 10/28/2013  (101198)  (1)
                                      ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter  15:27:47 - 10/28/2013  (101199)  (0)