|
Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better |
Brian; Yes, that's what he meant but I didn't find it out until much later. We've tried his predictions all sorts of ways, with or without mags, different mag definitions, planetary influences, etc. Each time he fails and comes up with a different idea - which also fails. But he persists. I don't mind, I enjoy the challenge. Roger
Follow Ups: ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit 03:53:37 - 10/27/2013 (101182) (1) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Skywise 04:39:56 - 10/27/2013 (101183) (1) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit 06:53:20 - 10/27/2013 (101184) (1) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Roger Hunter 09:05:19 - 10/27/2013 (101185) (1) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit 10:44:35 - 10/27/2013 (101186) (2) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Skywise 16:30:29 - 10/27/2013 (101189) (0) ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter 14:27:06 - 10/27/2013 (101188) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 22:48:00 - 10/27/2013 (101192) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 10:31:30 - 10/28/2013 (101194) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 10:51:00 - 10/28/2013 (101195) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 12:30:11 - 10/28/2013 (101196) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 12:41:16 - 10/28/2013 (101197) (1) ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter 13:37:38 - 10/28/2013 (101198) (1) ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter 15:27:47 - 10/28/2013 (101199) (0) |
|