|
|
|
|
| Re: 6.4 quake on 4 th Oct 2013 |
Is this using the same probability subroutine in the code I converted to XB? How were those values calculated for the lookup table? You might want to double check those just to eliminate that as a possible source of the error. Brian Follow Ups: ● Re: 6.4 quake on 4 th Oct 2013 - Roger Hunter 20:49:38 - 10/6/2013 (100995) (1) ● Re: 6.4 quake on 4 th Oct 2013 - Skywise 21:53:17 - 10/6/2013 (100996) (1) ● Re: 6.4 quake on 4 th Oct 2013 - Skywise 22:21:51 - 10/6/2013 (100997) (2) ● Re: 6.4 quake on 4 th Oct 2013; correction - Roger Hunter 22:27:44 - 10/6/2013 (100999) (1) ● Re: 6.4 quake on 4 th Oct 2013; correction - Skywise 22:36:29 - 10/6/2013 (101000) (1) ● Re: 6.4 quake on 4 th Oct 2013; correction - Roger Hunter 23:11:45 - 10/6/2013 (101001) (1) ● Re: We beter take this to email - Roger Hunter 23:13:25 - 10/6/2013 (101002) (1) ● Re: We beter take this to email - Skywise 00:02:41 - 10/7/2013 (101003) (1) ● Got it... - Skywise 00:29:41 - 10/7/2013 (101004) (2) ● Re: Got it...maybe - Roger Hunter 10:26:41 - 10/7/2013 (101008) (1) ● Re: Got it...maybe - Skywise 14:20:39 - 10/7/2013 (101010) (1) ● Re: Got it...maybe - Roger Hunter 15:00:08 - 10/7/2013 (101012) (1) ● Re: Got it...maybe - Skywise 15:07:25 - 10/7/2013 (101013) (1) ● Re: Got it...maybe - Roger Hunter 16:38:06 - 10/7/2013 (101014) (1) ● Re: Got it...maybe - Skywise 22:32:32 - 10/7/2013 (101015) (1) ● Re: Got it...maybe - Roger Hunter 23:41:53 - 10/7/2013 (101016) (1) ● Re: Got it...maybe - Skywise 00:26:29 - 10/8/2013 (101017) (1) ● Re: Got it...maybe - Roger Hunter 00:54:16 - 10/8/2013 (101018) (0) ● Re: Got it... - Island Chris 08:43:46 - 10/7/2013 (101006) (2) ● Re: Got it... - Skywise 14:22:09 - 10/7/2013 (101011) (0) ● Re: Got it... - Roger Hunter 10:20:24 - 10/7/2013 (101007) (0) ● Re: 6.4 quake on 4 th Oct 2013 - Roger Hunter 22:26:43 - 10/6/2013 (100998) (0) |
|
|
|
|
