|
Re: Got it... |
You can leave the conversation here...I just read this whole part of thread. Hmm, I guess we can't ask Amit to accept an evaluation if multiple series of random dates do not come out as chance very closely. Roger keeps complaining that even if there was something statistically to Amit's predictions it still would not be useful because there is no location. I have always disagreed with these kinds of comments: it would bear on what triggers quakes. Baby steps here. That is all even professional scientists working on the problem are going to get. Chris Follow Ups: ● Re: Got it... - Skywise 14:22:09 - 10/7/2013 (101011) (0) ● Re: Got it... - Roger Hunter 10:20:24 - 10/7/2013 (101007) (0) |
|