Roger,

As you are undoubtedly aware, E-mail, Newsgroup notes, and bulletin boards postings are not very efficient venues for explaining things. With my notes you might have to read them several times to understand everything. It would take too long to go into great detail.

The latest theories are that a powerful approaching earthquake can “activate” other fault zones so that they can generate EM Signals under the right conditions while the powerful earthquake is approaching. The “right” conditions are linked with solar storms and the positions of the sun and the moon in the sky.

So, if one powerful earthquake is approaching then some other fault zones where 5.5 magnitude earthquakes are going to occur can generate the EM Signals that I work with. But none of the signals might point to the location of the more powerful 7 magnitude earthquake.

So, since 2 signals were detected, the following are the possibilities:

A. One high magnitude earthquake and a moderately strong one that will be of no interest to anyone.

B. Two moderately strong earthquakes that will be of no interest to anyone plus one powerful one at a location that doesn’t appear on my computer charts.

If you go back to the first half of July of 2013 you will see two Earthquake Warnings that I posted. And in each case, within 5 days there was a 7.3 magnitude earthquake. As far as I am aware there haven’t been any that powerful since that time.

However, my EM Signals never pointed directly to either of those locations. So, I had to adjust my theories. And they now propose that those powerful earthquakes were actually “activating” other fault zones. And approaching earthquakes in those fault zones were responsible for the signals I detected in early July. I could tell which earthquakes DID actually generate the signals. But, in both cases there would not have been ANY signals at all if those 7.3 magnitude earthquakes were not approaching.

It is actually a little more complicated than that. But a full explanation would require more electrons. And the electrons have already done enough work for today! We don’t want them filing complains with the Labor Department (humor intended).

ADDITIONAL

I had another major computer crash last week. The root directory in its very large internal hard drive abruptly vanished without a trace. And I had to go through a lot of trouble to even get the hard drive reformatted and running again.

This is somewhat expected as I am shifting to older systems for doing most of the earthquake work in order to protect my two primary computers. They do wear out if you run them enough.

I presently have something like 5 computers in use with as many as 3 of them running at the same time doing different types of calculations or word processing.

But, good planning is paying off. I have my primary data on my main computer plus at least two backups of all of my important programs and data. There are about 300 gigabytes of data like that which are now stored on multiple systems. So, if one crashes like that one did I can get it running again or replace it and just copy all of the data back onto it from one of the other systems. They all run XP. The main one runs Vista.

Much of this is now automated. So the actual amount of effort required is minimal.

I have also recently had a chance to work with a new computer owned by a business run by someone that I know. That system has:

Windows 8
USB 3
A fast quad core processor
A 1.5 terabyte internal hard drive
8 gigabytes of RAM memory
Built in WiFi
The best computer speakers I have ever heard
Probably about the fastest Internet connection you can have without going to fiber cable

You almost need your own computer expert to help you figure out how Windows 8 works. It is quite a jump from Vista. But it is really nice for automatically taking care of things such as running local networks involving WiFi plus multiple computers and the Internet.

That system is incredible. USG 3 is extremely fast. The system is probably powerful enough to run the International Space Station. I have never seen anything like it. When the computer power is turned on I suspect that the lights in nearby buildings go dim for a few seconds.

The computer came “off the shelf” and cost about $500 without the monitor and speakers.

These are personal opinions.