This Earthquake Advisory is still active in case anyone is interested. And additional EM Signals have been detected the past few days. Data are presently being processes.

My thinking is that if you are going to do a lot of computer work you certainly want to have at least 2 systems that can do the same type of work. That way you can back up all your important data and test new programs on one of them. And if something goes wrong you can just copy everything back from the other computer.

One advantage that you have versus my programs is that TrueBasic does calculations much, much faster than Perl. It can do the types of calculations that I need to have done in minutes while Perl might require hours. But TB does not work well with Windows. And my programs need to have the ability to interact on multiple levels with Windows.

My present forecast data are in my opinion extraordinary!

It is too bad that people in the geology community are so strongly biased against anything associated with this science that they are deliberately ignoring this work along with everyone else's work. They are missing out on some interesting science that should be extremely important to them.

As soon as my computer programs have updated my Year Charts for 2008 through 2013 I am planning to post them to my forecast Web page or some other page at my Web site. It is easy to see how the chart line peaks are matching with powerful earthquakes that are occurring around the world. But it is possible that the charts are also showing where "Slow" or "Silent" earthquakes are occurring. It is my understanding that these are occurring in fault zones where strain build. But then instead of being released within a few minutes in a violent and often destructive event the strain is slowly released over a period of hours, days, or weeks. So there might be nothing on the surface to show that the slow or silent earthquake occurred. But, those events can be seen with my chart data.

These are personal opinions.