|
Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell |
Hi Lowell, First, thanks again for your contributions on this board. Second, in terms of far-field triggering, can one extrapolate backwards (or would that be interpolating?)? For example, I live in Aptos, CA. Do you have a method that would allow me to watch for certain larger earthquakes in certain areas that are most likely to trigger a far-field event under my house? Third, are far-field triggered events always lower in magnitude than the primary earthquake triggering them? As if you had nothing better to do with your Sunday... Thanks, Cathryn Follow Ups: ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Lowell 20:49:32 - 10/14/2001 (10006) (2) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Roger Hunter 11:29:46 - 10/15/2001 (10031) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Lowell 12:14:31 - 10/15/2001 (10034) (0) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 22:56:34 - 10/14/2001 (10015) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Lowell 23:59:02 - 10/14/2001 (10020) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - mark 10:02:29 - 10/15/2001 (10027) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 18:59:30 - 10/15/2001 (10043) (3) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - mark 20:24:01 - 10/15/2001 (10053) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 23:24:27 - 10/15/2001 (10060) (2) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Don In Hollister 00:18:32 - 10/16/2001 (10063) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 03:30:36 - 10/16/2001 (10065) (0) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - mark 23:57:52 - 10/15/2001 (10062) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 03:19:15 - 10/16/2001 (10064) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Canie 08:21:59 - 10/16/2001 (10067) (0) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Lowell 19:27:47 - 10/15/2001 (10048) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 22:51:28 - 10/15/2001 (10057) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Lowell 23:10:49 - 10/15/2001 (10059) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 23:28:47 - 10/15/2001 (10061) (0) ● Oops. Forgot to thank Roger. (NT) - Cathryn 19:03:57 - 10/15/2001 (10044) (0) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Roger Hunter 19:12:48 - 10/14/2001 (10000) (2) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 20:15:15 - 10/14/2001 (10003) (2) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Roger Hunter 11:26:26 - 10/15/2001 (10030) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 12:11:22 - 10/15/2001 (10033) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Roger Hunter 20:03:17 - 10/15/2001 (10049) (0) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Canie 20:40:37 - 10/14/2001 (10005) (1) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 22:57:15 - 10/14/2001 (10016) (0) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 20:15:14 - 10/14/2001 (10002) (0) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Don in Hollister 08:58:35 - 10/14/2001 (9991) (3) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Lowell 22:18:48 - 10/14/2001 (10012) (0) ● FFT Time delayed activation rationale - mark 20:14:14 - 10/14/2001 (10001) (2) ● Re: FFT Time delayed activation rationale - Don in Hollister 01:03:50 - 10/15/2001 (10023) (1) ● Re: FFT Time delayed activation rationale - mark 09:18:11 - 10/15/2001 (10025) (0) ● Re: FFT Time delayed activation rationale - Cathryn 23:14:57 - 10/14/2001 (10017) (1) ● Re: FFT Time delayed activation rationale - mark 10:07:46 - 10/15/2001 (10028) (0) ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn 16:46:52 - 10/14/2001 (9998) (0) |
|