|
Re: Lowell's "Verbal Carnage" |
I hadn't planned on joining or beginning another string on this board, but after stumbling on Lowell's "verbal carnage" message, I felt I had to respond. I brought my response up here to make sure Lowell doesn't have an excuse to miss it. I do so want to see your response, Lowell, and I promise to give you the last word as long as you don’t attempt to slander me so overtly again. Your attempt to slander me was deviously clever but I am nonetheless surprised that you caught so many suckers with such rotten bait. “Verbal carnage”? Hilarious. “Sexual innuendo”? Absurd. Censorship because of my messages? Scary. I think you have just exposed how shallow you really are, Lowell. By the way, I can't complete my research into your hypothetical proton storm-earthquake connection until you give me the name of the researcher I asked for a while ago. For your future information, it is considered unethical for a scientist to support his theories by bringing up future research that is being done by an unnamed scientist--it smells like selling snake oil. This raises an issue I brought up with 2-cents and it involves the issue of scientific credibility--are you a scientist? None of my business, but I am curious. My bet is that you won't answer that question. Anxiously awaiting your response... Follow Ups: ● Re: Lowell's "Verbal Carnage" - Roger Hunter 21:36:03 - 10/11/2001 (9955) (0) ● Re: Lowell's "Verbal Carnage" - Petra Challus 10:42:51 - 10/11/2001 (9933) (2) ● Re: Lowell's "Verbal Carnage" - dib 19:14:06 - 10/11/2001 (9947) (0) ● Thanks Petra - Lowell 15:36:53 - 10/11/2001 (9940) (1) ● Re: Thanks Petra - dib 18:43:36 - 10/11/2001 (9945) (1) ● Re: Thanks Petra - Lowell 19:09:39 - 10/11/2001 (9946) (0) |
|