|
|
|
|
| Re: TEC prediction failure |
OK. Here's another scenario - prediction for 4+ Los Angeles in a specified time window. How do you evaluate a hit or miss with such a vague location? I'm looking for a way to do so. To me it's obvious that an M4 would have to be closer to LA to consider it a hit than an M8. But where do you draw the line? Just looking for a way to evaluate fuzzy predictions. Brian Follow Ups: ● Re: TEC prediction failure - Roger Hunter 20:00:05 - 12/27/2012 (80930) (1) ● Re: TEC prediction failure - Skywise 20:05:00 - 12/27/2012 (80931) (1) ● Re: TEC prediction failure - Roger Hunter 20:10:55 - 12/27/2012 (80932) (1) ● Re: TEC prediction failure - Skywise 20:58:37 - 12/27/2012 (80933) (2) ● On the importance of mag. - Roger Hunter 09:09:53 - 12/28/2012 (80937) (1) ● Re: On the importance of mag. - Amit 03:44:01 - 12/29/2012 (80940) (1) ● Re: On the importance of mag. - Roger Hunter 07:07:39 - 12/29/2012 (80941) (1) ● Re: On the importance of mag. - Amit 01:29:16 - 12/30/2012 (80949) (1) ● Re: On the importance of mag. - Roger Hunter 07:02:39 - 12/30/2012 (80950) (0) ● Re: TEC prediction failure - Roger Hunter 08:17:27 - 12/28/2012 (80934) (3) ● Re: TEC prediction failure - Skywise 12:54:15 - 12/28/2012 (80938) (1) ● Re: TEC prediction failure - Roger Hunter 13:13:17 - 12/28/2012 (80939) (0) ● Re: Evaluation rules - Roger Hunter 08:34:40 - 12/28/2012 (80936) (0) ● Re: Evaluatipon rules - Roger Hunter 08:34:18 - 12/28/2012 (80935) (0) |
|
|
|
|
