|
|
|
|
| Re: Some Forecast Details – November 11, 2012 |
EQF; That was a perfect prediction with a very low probability. The NEIC catalog had only one similar quake in that area. Too bad it was not made publicly. It counts for nothing this way. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Some Forecast Details – November 11, 2012 - EQF 09:22:33 - 11/11/2012 (80540) (1) ● TEC Records – November 12, 2012 - EQF 14:59:38 - 11/12/2012 (80544) (1) ● Re: TEC Records – November 12, 2012 - Roger Hunter 16:03:30 - 11/12/2012 (80545) (1) ● Re: TEC Records – November 12, 2012 - EQF 17:04:27 - 11/12/2012 (80546) (1) ● Re: TEC Records – November 12, 2012 - Roger Hunter 20:02:58 - 11/12/2012 (80547) (1) ● Re: TEC Records – November 12, 2012 - EQF 21:32:43 - 11/12/2012 (80548) (1) ● Re: TEC Records – November 12, 2012 - EQF 05:36:04 - 11/13/2012 (80549) (1) ● Re: TEC Records – November 12, 2012 - Roger Hunter 07:28:11 - 11/13/2012 (80550) (0) |
|
|
|
|
