Re: Possible sun-moon test
Posted by Roger Hunter on December 24, 2011 at 17:51:27:

EQF;

Ok, no hurry.

I'll be occupied with family matters myself for the next few days.

So far I can say that about 20% of the quakes fall into 4 of the boxes with the rest scattered all over the place. Now I'm looking at the sun-moon angles for those 4 boxes. If there's no strong pattern differences I'll be fairly sure that's not the situation and sun-moon angle is not important.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Possible sun-moon test - Amit dave  08:53:42 - 12/25/2011  (79483)  (2)
        ● Re: Possible sun-moon test - Skywise  21:07:02 - 12/25/2011  (79485)  (1)
           ● Re: Possible sun-moon test - Amit  07:11:57 - 12/26/2011  (79489)  (1)
              ● Re: Possible sun-moon test - Skywise  10:56:43 - 12/26/2011  (79491)  (1)
                 ● Re: Possible sun-moon test - Roger Hunter  12:23:59 - 12/26/2011  (79492)  (1)
                    ● people have checked tides - John Vidale  18:21:45 - 12/26/2011  (79493)  (1)
                       ● Re: people have checked tides - Roger Hunter  19:02:11 - 12/26/2011  (79496)  (0)
        ● Re: Possible sun-moon test - Roger Hunter  12:37:10 - 12/25/2011  (79484)  (0)
     ● Re: Possible sun-moon test - Roger Hunter  08:51:40 - 12/25/2011  (79482)  (0)