Hi Roger,

If you wish to help advance this type of work then I suggest that you start keeping a list of the effects that I am discussing regarding how to interpret these data.

One of the things that I have repeatedly said is that for some reason, when an approaching earthquake gets above 7.5 magnitude, the fault zones in question appear to often stop generating the types of EM Signals that I normally work with. For one thing, the high intensity EM Signals might simply stop being generated for months. For another, any low intensity EM Signals that are generated might point to some longitude other than where the earthquake is going to occur.

At the present time my probability equations are not sophisticated enough to tell when this line peak location shift is occurring. And that is one of the reasons I have spent the past few months building another data processing routine into my forecasting program. It will make it easier to study that line peak location displacement problem and hopefully make it possible to determine what to do about it.

The physical laws that control how these EM Signals are being generated appear to be quite complex. My present theory is that they involve processes that are taking place in the fault zones and also the strength and orientation of the Earth’s geomagnetic field lines during various times of the day.

These appear to me to be some of the very most valuable earthquake precursors in part because at probably almost any location on Earth, they can be detected for earthquakes that are occurring around the world. So, it is worth it to learn what those physical laws are and how to work with them.

These are personal opinions.