|
Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011 |
EQF; I don't buy it. What you see is that you have peaks followed by quakes and peaks NOT followed by quakes. That's a classic case of chance correlation. Any two random sequences will sometimes correlate. And you have yet to show that there is any correlation greater than chance would allow between peaks and quakes. Until you do that, you're just chasing geese and blowing smoke. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011 - EQF 17:23:34 - 4/26/2011 (78689) (1) ● Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011 - Roger Hunter 17:46:46 - 4/26/2011 (78690) (1) ● Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011 - EQF 19:31:51 - 4/26/2011 (78691) (0) |
|