Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011
Posted by Roger Hunter on April 26, 2011 at 15:42:38:

EQF;

I don't buy it.

What you see is that you have peaks followed by quakes and peaks NOT followed by quakes.

That's a classic case of chance correlation. Any two random sequences will sometimes correlate. And you have yet to show that there is any correlation greater than chance would allow between peaks and quakes.

Until you do that, you're just chasing geese and blowing smoke.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011 - EQF  17:23:34 - 4/26/2011  (78689)  (1)
        ● Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011 - Roger Hunter  17:46:46 - 4/26/2011  (78690)  (1)
           ● Re: An Easy Data Processing Project For Roger (or anyone) – April 22, 2011 - EQF  19:31:51 - 4/26/2011  (78691)  (0)