Roger to prove practically
Posted by Amit Dave on June 27, 2010 at 07:50:50:

Roger
Now ,at least to prove your point that my predictions are below average,you should give some dates
with equal numbers of date hits.
If you can not do that,it means there is something wrong with your average calculation methods( basically due to clusters)
One which is theoretically correct should prove practically.
Every time you ask me to prove the date hits. Now ,after series of date hits, onus is on you to prove practically, that ,you or any body can give equal number of date hits
Amit


Follow Ups:
     ● Probability Calculations June 29, 2010 - EQF  16:03:02 - 6/29/2010  (77298)  (1)
        ● Re: Probability Calculations June 29, 2010 - Roger Hunter  21:08:20 - 6/29/2010  (77299)  (1)
           ● Re: Probability Calculations June 29, 2010 - EQF  23:07:45 - 6/29/2010  (77300)  (1)
              ● Re: Probability Calculations June 29, 2010 - Skywise  18:20:55 - 6/30/2010  (77301)  (1)
                 ● Re: Probability Calculations June 29, 2010 - EQF  13:26:57 - 7/2/2010  (77311)  (0)
     ● Re: Roger to prove practically - Roger Hunter  09:47:09 - 6/27/2010  (77287)  (1)
        ● Re: Roger to prove practically - Amit Dave  00:44:28 - 6/28/2010  (77289)  (2)
           ● Re: Roger to prove practically - Skywise  14:05:01 - 6/28/2010  (77292)  (1)
              ● Re: Roger to prove practically - Roger Hunter  14:13:23 - 6/28/2010  (77293)  (1)
                 ● Re: Roger to prove practically - Skywise  17:31:35 - 6/28/2010  (77294)  (1)
                    ● Re: Roger to prove practically - Roger Hunter  18:28:51 - 6/28/2010  (77295)  (1)
                       ● Re: Roger to prove practically - Skywise  20:41:05 - 6/28/2010  (77296)  (1)
                          ● Re: Roger to prove practically - Jim W.  08:31:31 - 6/29/2010  (77297)  (0)
           ● Re: Roger to prove practically - Roger Hunter  08:41:25 - 6/28/2010  (77291)  (0)