Re: big aftershocks
Posted by Roger Hunter on May 11, 2010 at 08:32:03:

Amit;

If you are using a 1 day window, predicting the exact date of the quake, the odds are 16/365 or .0438.

But your question is too simple. Even with odds that small it is possible to get more hits than expected. The question then becomes how likely is it that your answer is solely due to chance.

My test is strict because I want to avoid false positives. Thus I want results at the 99% level. The number of hits and misses depend on the number of predictions. If you make 16 predictions you need to get 8 hits to pass.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● 99% level - heartland chris  07:01:10 - 5/13/2010  (77025)  (2)
        ● Re: 99% level - Amit Dave  01:33:20 - 5/14/2010  (77033)  (1)
           ● Re: 99% level - Roger Hunter  07:07:21 - 5/14/2010  (77036)  (1)
              ● Re: 99% level - heartland chris  14:13:10 - 5/15/2010  (77045)  (0)
        ● Re: 99% level - Roger Hunter  07:23:28 - 5/13/2010  (77026)  (0)
     ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave  11:12:46 - 5/11/2010  (77013)  (1)
        ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter  11:57:02 - 5/11/2010  (77014)  (1)
           ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter  12:21:16 - 5/11/2010  (77015)  (1)
              ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave  03:27:59 - 5/12/2010  (77016)  (1)
                 ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter  08:03:06 - 5/12/2010  (77017)  (1)
                    ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave  10:24:06 - 5/12/2010  (77018)  (1)
                       ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter  11:13:09 - 5/12/2010  (77019)  (1)
                          ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter  11:21:27 - 5/12/2010  (77020)  (1)
                             ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave  23:58:10 - 5/12/2010  (77023)  (2)
                                ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter  07:29:52 - 5/13/2010  (77027)  (1)
                                   ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave  00:05:05 - 5/14/2010  (77030)  (1)
                                      ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter  07:04:36 - 5/14/2010  (77035)  (0)
                                ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave  02:02:04 - 5/13/2010  (77024)  (1)
                                   ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter  07:32:13 - 5/13/2010  (77028)  (1)
                                      ● Re: big aftershocks - Amit Dave  00:18:06 - 5/14/2010  (77031)  (1)
                                         ● Re: big aftershocks - Roger Hunter  07:12:56 - 5/14/2010  (77037)  (0)