Re: New book by Susan Hough is out
Posted by Skywise on December 09, 2009 at 19:54:13:

Most of what I have read so far describes 'real' prediction efforts, what the hopes were and how they failed. There are a few chapters that slowly grow towards the 'fringe' element. Some of the ideas are only glossed over in generalities with no names mentioned, but four amateurs are mentioned by name.

From the acknowledgments page:

"I am further indebted to a number of individuals outside the mainstream scientific community who have been willing to engage in a dialog: in particular Petra Challus, Don Eck, Zhonghou Shou, and Brian Vanderkolk (known in earthquake prediction circles as Skywise). I am not sure they will be entirely happy with what I have to say. I hope they, and others, will see the book as critical but fair..."

So yes, I get some small mention for the prediction game I had run on my website. And, I do agree that it was a fair assessment of the individuals.

I am still not done reading, but I do find it interesting that a particular person get's no mention at all - JOB.

Brian


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: New book by Susan Hough is out - EQF  06:36:17 - 12/10/2009  (76259)  (1)
        ● lack of evidence - John Vidale  08:01:32 - 12/10/2009  (76260)  (2)
           ● Re: lack of evidence - Skywise  20:46:29 - 12/10/2009  (76264)  (0)
           ● Check These Data - EQF  10:18:41 - 12/10/2009  (76261)  (2)
              ● ?? - John Vidale  22:06:03 - 12/12/2009  (76272)  (1)
                 ● Year Charts - EQF  18:57:41 - 12/16/2009  (76279)  (1)
                    ● groundhog day - John Vidale  16:46:30 - 12/19/2009  (76288)  (1)
                       ● Wrong animal - EQF  23:41:10 - 12/19/2009  (76289)  (2)
                          ● Re: Wrong animal - Skywise  19:01:26 - 12/20/2009  (76291)  (0)
                          ● so where's the proof? - John Vidale  09:20:46 - 12/20/2009  (76290)  (0)
              ● Re: Check These Data - Skywise  20:50:44 - 12/10/2009  (76265)  (0)