Re: Project for Roger; first results
Posted by Roger Hunter on June 18, 2008 at 11:35:56:

If it is correct, it's significance level is about 97% for a single tail test.

Suggestive but not conclusive.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  15:35:37 - 6/18/2008  (74051)  (1)
        ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter  16:31:11 - 6/18/2008  (74054)  (2)
           ● not a random test - John Vidale  08:07:52 - 6/21/2008  (74065)  (1)
              ● Re: not a random test - Roger Hunter  09:19:15 - 6/21/2008  (74066)  (1)
                 ● Re: not a random test - John Vidale  10:37:07 - 6/21/2008  (74067)  (1)
                    ● Re: not a random test - Roger Hunter  10:53:25 - 6/21/2008  (74068)  (2)
                       ● Re: not a random test - marc / berkeley  14:25:12 - 6/24/2008  (74082)  (1)
                          ● Re: not a random test; Marc - Roger Hunter  15:42:11 - 6/24/2008  (74083)  (0)
                       ● he talks about many indicators - John Vidale  11:13:23 - 6/21/2008  (74069)  (0)
           ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Cathryn  08:38:54 - 6/19/2008  (74055)  (1)
              ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter  10:51:55 - 6/19/2008  (74056)  (1)
                 ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Cathryn  11:31:54 - 6/19/2008  (74057)  (2)
                    ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter  12:30:06 - 6/19/2008  (74059)  (1)
                       ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Cathryn  14:13:53 - 6/19/2008  (74060)  (0)
                    ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter  12:27:10 - 6/19/2008  (74058)  (1)
                       ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Cathryn  14:14:37 - 6/19/2008  (74061)  (0)