|
Re: not a random test |
John; Yes, works for me. I doubt Jim went to that much effort. I think he just went with the windows he set up for the California predictions. He'll protest that these aren't his windows and they aren't. I used a 6 day window centered on the supermoon date whereas he uses a window that shifts around and is off center, allowing more time after the syzygy. But I found quakes preceeding as well as following. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: not a random test - marc / berkeley 14:25:12 - 6/24/2008 (74082) (1) ● Re: not a random test; Marc - Roger Hunter 15:42:11 - 6/24/2008 (74083) (0) ● he talks about many indicators - John Vidale 11:13:23 - 6/21/2008 (74069) (0) |
|