Re: not a random test
Posted by Roger Hunter on June 21, 2008 at 10:53:25:

John;

Yes, works for me.

I doubt Jim went to that much effort. I think he just went with the windows he set up for the California predictions.

He'll protest that these aren't his windows and they aren't. I used a 6 day window centered on the supermoon date whereas he uses a window that shifts around and is off center, allowing more time after the syzygy.

But I found quakes preceeding as well as following.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: not a random test - marc / berkeley  14:25:12 - 6/24/2008  (74082)  (1)
        ● Re: not a random test; Marc - Roger Hunter  15:42:11 - 6/24/2008  (74083)  (0)
     ● he talks about many indicators - John Vidale  11:13:23 - 6/21/2008  (74069)  (0)