|
|
|
|
| Re: Global Warning Advocates -- is this what you want? |
Even considering the extraordinarily biased, and pathologically misguided, source, it all sounds pretty good to me. Subsequent to March of 2003, I pretty much stopped reading W.S.J. and turned to more reliable sources. Mike Williams Follow Ups: ● The minute Murdoch bought it.... - PennyB 14:24:59 - 6/4/2008 (73961) (0) ● Re: Global Warning Advocates -- is this what you want? - Barbara 22:45:28 - 6/3/2008 (73953) (2) ● sounds like more of the same - John Vidale 23:30:03 - 6/5/2008 (73967) (1) ● WSJ additional - Barbara 02:42:03 - 6/7/2008 (73973) (1) ● call for a stall - John Vidale 08:41:37 - 6/7/2008 (73979) (0) ● Re: Global Warning Advocates -- is this what you want? - Canie 23:36:04 - 6/3/2008 (73956) (2) ● Re: Global Warning Advocates -- is this what you want? - Skywise 22:06:57 - 6/4/2008 (73962) (0) ● Re: Global Warning Advocates -- is this what you want? - Barbara 00:07:34 - 6/4/2008 (73957) (1) ● Re: Global Warning Advocates -- is this what you want? - heartland chris 07:41:51 - 6/4/2008 (73958) (1) ● one quick comment - Barbara 09:11:34 - 6/4/2008 (73959) (1) ● Re: one quick comment - Canie 13:08:10 - 6/4/2008 (73960) (2) ● Re: one quick comment - Cathryn 20:32:23 - 6/7/2008 (73992) (2) ● Re: one quick comment - Canie 23:56:16 - 6/7/2008 (74000) (0) ● Re: one quick comment - heartland chris 22:58:47 - 6/7/2008 (73996) (1) ● Re: one quick comment - Cathryn 13:39:04 - 6/9/2008 (74018) (0) ● Legislation is out of control . . . - Tony 21:26:11 - 6/5/2008 (73965) (1) ● Re: Legislation is out of control . . . - Tony 21:28:26 - 6/5/2008 (73966) (0) |
|
|
|
|
