Re: February 1st 2008 California Quake Risk
Posted by Glen on January 31, 2008 at 20:56:34:

Hello Luke,

Could you give some geographical description to these? I don't bother with y-tubes or stuff. Just a community with some lat-lons will work. Also some fault info with possible depth and mechanism would help. My Indio came within 7.98554 Km's, but was .3 mag too low, and the depth was 12.4Km, which was .4 too deep.
Also Berkeley has a number of hits on adjoining faults, all too low, and too far, but I think I was seeing the right action. To each his own, but I can't keep up with predicts that don't clearly define an area, OR a reason why a quake should happen...no matter the energy. Hope you can clarify.

Glen


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: February 1st 2008 California Quake Risk - Skywise  21:13:40 - 1/31/2008  (73237)  (1)
        ● Re: February 1st 2008 California Quake Risk - Glen  21:47:26 - 1/31/2008  (73240)  (1)
           ● Good Morning ...  - Luke Thomas  06:23:04 - 2/1/2008  (73241)  (2)
              ● The problem with Borrego Springs - Glen  18:26:13 - 2/2/2008  (73263)  (0)
              ● Re: Good Morning ...  - PennyB  11:34:51 - 2/1/2008  (73244)  (2)
                 ● O/T super bowl party - heartland chris  10:38:04 - 2/2/2008  (73259)  (1)
                    ● Re: O/T super bowl party - PennyB  11:34:47 - 2/2/2008  (73262)  (0)
                 ● Re: Good Morning ...  - Canie  11:44:29 - 2/1/2008  (73245)  (2)
                    ● Re: Good Morning ...  - Skywise  21:52:54 - 2/1/2008  (73251)  (0)
                    ● Re: Good Morning ...  - Cathryn  18:41:01 - 2/1/2008  (73250)  (0)