Re: Earthquake forecasts online
Posted by lowell on April 30, 2001 at 21:26:03:

I will pay more attention to his postings and see if I agree with you.
I once suggested to him that perhaps HE would be better off not to have
people doing statistical analysis of his work. After all, he was making money
from his forecasts and the most likely effect of statistics would be to make
them look more random. He told me he actually made very little off them
(just enough to keep publishing). I don't know if that is still true, but with
the accessibility from the web, it is hard to see how he could be making much.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - michael  21:29:15 - 4/30/2001  (7220)  (1)
        ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Petra Challus  23:01:58 - 4/30/2001  (7221)  (2)
           ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - bobshannon.org  04:51:57 - 5/1/2001  (7225)  (0)
           ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Lowell  23:24:34 - 4/30/2001  (7222)  (1)
              ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Roger Hunter  04:40:37 - 5/1/2001  (7224)  (1)
                 ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - michael  15:43:46 - 5/1/2001  (7236)  (3)
                    ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Roger Hunter  17:21:14 - 5/1/2001  (7241)  (0)
                    ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Roger Hunter  17:18:47 - 5/1/2001  (7239)  (1)
                       ● Sorry, duplicate. Time lag in refresh - Roger Hunter  17:24:06 - 5/1/2001  (7242)  (0)
                    ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Lowell  16:09:14 - 5/1/2001  (7237)  (1)
                       ● Roger and JOB - michael  10:34:52 - 5/2/2001  (7266)  (1)
                          ● Re: Roger and JOB - Lowell  10:57:48 - 5/2/2001  (7269)  (1)
                             ● Re: Roger and JOB - Roger Hunter  12:33:55 - 5/2/2001  (7282)  (1)
                                ● Outrage - michael  15:51:04 - 5/2/2001  (7314)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Outrage - Roger Hunter  16:24:32 - 5/2/2001  (7330)  (0)