Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity
Posted by Lowell on April 30, 2001 at 23:24:34:

Petra,
Thank you for the previous post. I know this has been said many times on this board,
but it bears saying again. There are too many people who choose to attack a person
rather than the methods that person uses when they disagree. Civility is important
in any public discussion. If we feel people are incorrect in their analysis and conclusions,
then we should show why. Being wrong is no reflection on a person's character
(nor for that matter is being right). Who among us has not been wrong at one time
or another (or should I rephrase to ask who among us has ever been completely right).


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Roger Hunter  04:40:37 - 5/1/2001  (7224)  (1)
        ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - michael  15:43:46 - 5/1/2001  (7236)  (3)
           ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Roger Hunter  17:21:14 - 5/1/2001  (7241)  (0)
           ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Roger Hunter  17:18:47 - 5/1/2001  (7239)  (1)
              ● Sorry, duplicate. Time lag in refresh - Roger Hunter  17:24:06 - 5/1/2001  (7242)  (0)
           ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Lowell  16:09:14 - 5/1/2001  (7237)  (1)
              ● Roger and JOB - michael  10:34:52 - 5/2/2001  (7266)  (1)
                 ● Re: Roger and JOB - Lowell  10:57:48 - 5/2/2001  (7269)  (1)
                    ● Re: Roger and JOB - Roger Hunter  12:33:55 - 5/2/2001  (7282)  (1)
                       ● Outrage - michael  15:51:04 - 5/2/2001  (7314)  (1)
                          ● Re: Outrage - Roger Hunter  16:24:32 - 5/2/2001  (7330)  (0)