Glen,

I provided plenty of reasons to substantiate my characterization of Condon's nonsense as "snake oil." And I am no more inclined to to pose "technical questions" to him regarding geophysics, or to engage him in a "scientifically derived conversation," than I would be with Paris Hilton. Less so, in fact.

And I don't care which source or form of energy, or unlikely combination of same, he chooses to conjure up. Though one or more of the sources you named might, conceivably, mitigate against one small part of my argument, there is no way any of them can overcome the extreme improbability of the Rube Goldberg scheme he proposes.

And if your comment regarding the USGS was meant to suggest the facts I used in my post came from them, and that they are wrong, then I think discussions with you regarding science in general might be equally futile. Maybe I've misinterpreted that one. I hope so.

MW
93420