Re: Interesting
Posted by Glen on July 19, 2007 at 04:47:43:

Mike,

Again, you have refused to comment on the subject of research which employs ULF, AE, or MT as possible precursory signals to large earthquakes. USGS studied ULF at Parkfield, with limited results, as I understand it. You also did not post the header at Condons' website....

"GeoSeismic Labs Reports:2007
All forecasts are based upon Quantitative Analysis using Empirical Methods. Any information related to a forecast expressed by GeoSeismic Labs is considered a test of a hypothesis, and experimental in nature."

Pretty much says it all. If you intend to be something other than a pseudo-skeptic, start providing contrary evidence to the subject matter you are dealing with. Roger Hunter does. Put some meat on the plate.

Glen


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Interesting - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  06:51:54 - 7/19/2007  (72193)  (1)
        ● Agreed - Glen  16:30:58 - 7/19/2007  (72195)  (1)
           ● Re: Agreed - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  22:25:22 - 7/19/2007  (72201)  (0)