Follow-up and new update
Posted by Dennis on April 24, 2001 at 12:53:58:

Back on 4/19 at 13:18 I had posted about potential M4+ activity between the Ridgecrest and Mammoth areas within the next 4 days (see post 6852). Well, even though an M4+ didn't occur we did get 3 M3's with one being an M3.5. This identifies one area of my process that I have a problem with which is to be able to differentiate between a single quake and a swarm. But I did have the area and windows right.

Also I had posted about the electron flux in that same post for an M6.8+ in 5 days somewhere in the world. Well, we did get the Solomon Ms6.6 shortly thereafter and I haven't been able to find the Mw reading for that yet. I should get the QED in the next few days to see what the various magnitude readings are (including the infamous Mw). But then, we did have several M6's in a short period of time here.

New update is that the Electron flux has again been in a decreased state for the last 2 1/2 days so we should potentially be experiencing additional M6.8+ activity somewhere in the world over the next 5 days.

Dennis


Follow Ups:
     ● Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  13:15:06 - 4/24/2001  (6978)  (3)
        ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Canie  13:23:49 - 4/24/2001  (6988)  (2)
           ● Area - michael  13:29:09 - 4/24/2001  (6992)  (1)
              ● michael, It'd be nice if you got logical (nt) - Dennis  14:14:17 - 4/24/2001  (7000)  (1)
                 ● Logical? - michael  22:39:59 - 4/24/2001  (7015)  (0)
           ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Canie  13:27:30 - 4/24/2001  (6990)  (1)
              ● Coso - michael  13:30:38 - 4/24/2001  (6993)  (0)
        ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  13:23:49 - 4/24/2001  (6987)  (0)
        ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  13:18:05 - 4/24/2001  (6980)  (1)
           ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  13:22:57 - 4/24/2001  (6986)  (1)
              ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  13:26:05 - 4/24/2001  (6989)  (2)
                 ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Canie  13:41:16 - 4/24/2001  (6996)  (1)
                    ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  13:57:03 - 4/24/2001  (6997)  (1)
                       ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  14:11:58 - 4/24/2001  (6999)  (0)
                 ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  13:33:22 - 4/24/2001  (6995)  (1)
                    ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  14:10:26 - 4/24/2001  (6998)  (2)
                       ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  16:59:40 - 4/24/2001  (7007)  (1)
                          ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  22:20:52 - 4/24/2001  (7012)  (1)
                             ● Boasting - michael  22:38:46 - 4/24/2001  (7013)  (0)
                       ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter  15:24:52 - 4/24/2001  (7006)  (2)
                          ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  09:48:59 - 4/25/2001  (7026)  (0)
                          ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  17:01:59 - 4/24/2001  (7008)  (2)
                             ● butt head posts again (nt) - Dennis  09:50:08 - 4/25/2001  (7028)  (0)
                             ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter  17:31:42 - 4/24/2001  (7009)  (1)
                                ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  22:44:46 - 4/24/2001  (7016)  (0)