|
Follow-up and new update |
Back on 4/19 at 13:18 I had posted about potential M4+ activity between the Ridgecrest and Mammoth areas within the next 4 days (see post 6852). Well, even though an M4+ didn't occur we did get 3 M3's with one being an M3.5. This identifies one area of my process that I have a problem with which is to be able to differentiate between a single quake and a swarm. But I did have the area and windows right. Also I had posted about the electron flux in that same post for an M6.8+ in 5 days somewhere in the world. Well, we did get the Solomon Ms6.6 shortly thereafter and I haven't been able to find the Mw reading for that yet. I should get the QED in the next few days to see what the various magnitude readings are (including the infamous Mw). But then, we did have several M6's in a short period of time here. New update is that the Electron flux has again been in a decreased state for the last 2 1/2 days so we should potentially be experiencing additional M6.8+ activity somewhere in the world over the next 5 days. Dennis Follow Ups: ● Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 13:15:06 - 4/24/2001 (6978) (3) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Canie 13:23:49 - 4/24/2001 (6988) (2) ● Area - michael 13:29:09 - 4/24/2001 (6992) (1) ● michael, It'd be nice if you got logical (nt) - Dennis 14:14:17 - 4/24/2001 (7000) (1) ● Logical? - michael 22:39:59 - 4/24/2001 (7015) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Canie 13:27:30 - 4/24/2001 (6990) (1) ● Coso - michael 13:30:38 - 4/24/2001 (6993) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 13:23:49 - 4/24/2001 (6987) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 13:18:05 - 4/24/2001 (6980) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 13:22:57 - 4/24/2001 (6986) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 13:26:05 - 4/24/2001 (6989) (2) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Canie 13:41:16 - 4/24/2001 (6996) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 13:57:03 - 4/24/2001 (6997) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 14:11:58 - 4/24/2001 (6999) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 13:33:22 - 4/24/2001 (6995) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 14:10:26 - 4/24/2001 (6998) (2) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 16:59:40 - 4/24/2001 (7007) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 22:20:52 - 4/24/2001 (7012) (1) ● Boasting - michael 22:38:46 - 4/24/2001 (7013) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter 15:24:52 - 4/24/2001 (7006) (2) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 09:48:59 - 4/25/2001 (7026) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 17:01:59 - 4/24/2001 (7008) (2) ● butt head posts again (nt) - Dennis 09:50:08 - 4/25/2001 (7028) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter 17:31:42 - 4/24/2001 (7009) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 22:44:46 - 4/24/2001 (7016) (0) |
|