Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth
Posted by Roger Hunter on April 24, 2001 at 15:24:52:

Hey;

are you two at it again? Sheesh! I turn my back for a minute and look what happens....

Dennis, why are you so touchy? Michael asked a perfectly correct question;

exactly what area are you talking about?

You gave two place names only. That's a line. Unless you really mean the expected quake will fall on that line, it's a vague prediction. You MUST give an area or a range or something.

For example "20 km either side of a line between A and B" would work although I don't know how we could evaluate it. We can only search rectangles and circles with the NEIC database.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  09:48:59 - 4/25/2001  (7026)  (0)
     ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  17:01:59 - 4/24/2001  (7008)  (2)
        ● butt head posts again (nt) - Dennis  09:50:08 - 4/25/2001  (7028)  (0)
        ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter  17:31:42 - 4/24/2001  (7009)  (1)
           ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  22:44:46 - 4/24/2001  (7016)  (0)