Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth
Posted by Dennis on April 24, 2001 at 13:26:05:

I'm sorry, but I don't agree. I said between two points and activity happened between two points. That isn't vague.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Canie  13:41:16 - 4/24/2001  (6996)  (1)
        ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  13:57:03 - 4/24/2001  (6997)  (1)
           ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  14:11:58 - 4/24/2001  (6999)  (0)
     ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  13:33:22 - 4/24/2001  (6995)  (1)
        ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  14:10:26 - 4/24/2001  (6998)  (2)
           ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  16:59:40 - 4/24/2001  (7007)  (1)
              ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  22:20:52 - 4/24/2001  (7012)  (1)
                 ● Boasting - michael  22:38:46 - 4/24/2001  (7013)  (0)
           ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter  15:24:52 - 4/24/2001  (7006)  (2)
              ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis  09:48:59 - 4/25/2001  (7026)  (0)
              ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  17:01:59 - 4/24/2001  (7008)  (2)
                 ● butt head posts again (nt) - Dennis  09:50:08 - 4/25/2001  (7028)  (0)
                 ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter  17:31:42 - 4/24/2001  (7009)  (1)
                    ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael  22:44:46 - 4/24/2001  (7016)  (0)