Re: Afghanistan Earthquake April 4, 2007
Posted by Roger Hunter on April 06, 2007 at 07:45:28:

EQF;

No, it's not that difficult. What you described is how it SHOULD work, not how it does work.

In fact, if you watch your location on the chart you may see a peak get bigger and bigger but the quake may or may not happen. Or it may be a quake somewhere else on your longitude. Or not.

So the charts are useless. The correlation is random.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● How the forecasting program works - EQF  01:23:08 - 4/7/2007  (65430)  (1)
        ● Re: How the forecasting program works - Roger Hunter  08:06:09 - 4/7/2007  (65443)  (1)
           ● Re: How the forecasting program works - EQF  01:10:45 - 4/8/2007  (65491)  (1)
              ● Another Important Breakthrough April 8, 2007 - EQF  04:49:18 - 4/8/2007  (65504)  (1)
                 ● Re: Another Important Breakthrough April 8, 2007 - Roger Hunter  09:07:27 - 4/8/2007  (65513)  (2)
                    ● Re: Another Important Breakthrough April 8, 2007 - EQF  23:23:45 - 4/8/2007  (65538)  (1)
                       ● Re: Another Important Breakthrough April 8, 2007 - Roger Hunter  00:07:42 - 4/9/2007  (65549)  (1)
                          ● Re: Another Important Breakthrough April 8, 2007 - EQF  05:03:43 - 4/9/2007  (65569)  (0)
                    ● Not a total loss - Roger Hunter  18:26:27 - 4/8/2007  (65522)  (0)