|
Re: Bells and Whistles |
Actually, all it would do is multiply everything. Remember, you only count hits and misses. So in your 100 quake example if you had a 1 day window incremented by minutes you would have 1440 hits instead of 1 or 2 and the total would multiply by 1440 as well. You wouldn't bell up any; you'd just have a bunch of hits as the sliding windows passed over the clusters. The partial window problem at the end would be compounded as well, with the final window getting smaller and smaller. I see no merit in this. David is upset that we didn't take his suggestions. Tough. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Bells and Whistles - michael 12:23:51 - 3/21/2001 (6253) (1) ● Re: Bells and Whistles - Roger Hunter 15:06:15 - 3/21/2001 (6257) (1) ● Re: Bells and Whistles - michael 15:18:10 - 3/21/2001 (6258) (2) ● Re: Bells and Whistles - Roger Hunter 16:21:16 - 3/21/2001 (6261) (0) ● Re: Bells and Whistles - Roger Hunter 15:32:45 - 3/21/2001 (6260) (1) ● Windows - michael 16:38:23 - 3/21/2001 (6262) (2) ● Re: Windows - Roger Hunter 19:42:47 - 3/21/2001 (6268) (0) ● Look at it this way .... - michael 16:54:57 - 3/21/2001 (6263) (2) ● Re: Look at it this way .... - Roger Hunter 19:25:23 - 3/21/2001 (6267) (1) ● We've come to drawing? Yikes! ;) - michael 21:27:55 - 3/21/2001 (6269) (1) ● Re: We've come to drawing? Yikes! ;) - Roger Hunter 06:33:47 - 3/22/2001 (6274) (0) ● Re: Look at it this way .... - Roger Hunter 18:55:35 - 3/21/2001 (6266) (0) |
|