Re: Not shocked
Posted by Cathryn on December 30, 2006 at 22:31:56:

Yes, you were the only one to geologically address the fact that Bush has mandated only the Creationist version of the canyon be mentioned by park rangers and literature on the canyon; that it was caused by Noah's flood. How ridiculous. And if that were true, it would make it even younger than 6K years. I can't wait for Bush to be out of office.

I did see a great bumper sticker the other day. It said, "Some other asshole for president." (Sorry Canie.)

Cathryn

Follow Ups:
     ● Attention: Pseudo-scientists - Barbara  08:44:21 - 12/31/2006  (61633)  (2)
        ● Re: Attention: Pseudo-scientists - Cathryn  21:55:02 - 12/31/2006  (61652)  (0)
        ● What? - Glen  10:33:05 - 12/31/2006  (61636)  (1)
           ● Re: What? - Barbara  10:46:39 - 12/31/2006  (61637)  (1)
              ● Nice forum - Glen  12:46:06 - 12/31/2006  (61639)  (1)
                 ● Re: Nice forum - Barbara  14:30:23 - 12/31/2006  (61642)  (1)
                    ● Re: Nice forum - Roger Hunter  19:18:19 - 12/31/2006  (61646)  (2)
                       ● layman - heartland chris  07:34:38 - 1/1/2007  (61661)  (0)
                       ● Re: Nice forum - Barbara  20:01:17 - 12/31/2006  (61647)  (2)
                          ● First Barbara... - Cathryn  22:12:14 - 12/31/2006  (61653)  (1)
                             ● Re: First Barbara... - Barbara  02:27:38 - 1/1/2007  (61658)  (0)
                          ● Re: Nice forum - Glen  20:49:25 - 12/31/2006  (61648)  (1)
                             ● Re: Nice forum - Roger Hunter  21:26:36 - 12/31/2006  (61650)  (1)
                                ● You never know... - Glen  00:40:14 - 1/1/2007  (61655)  (0)