|
Re: This looks like trash to me (nt) |
It is trash because it: 1) does not make use of tolerance levels 2) does not inform people on whether or not a predictor is somewhere in the ball park so that people can make a decision as to whether or not they might want to do something about it (people, including myself, aren't going to look thru a bunch of messages to find comments about past predictions) 3) tries to make a prediction methodology look like it doesn't work
Follow Ups: ● Trash Talking - michael 17:03:13 - 2/22/2001 (5356) (1) ● Re: Trash Talking - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 19:01:08 - 2/22/2001 (5358) (1) ● Possible Solution? - michael 19:51:50 - 2/22/2001 (5362) (2) ● Re: Possible Solution? - Roger Hunter 20:52:40 - 2/22/2001 (5366) (1) ● Circles - michael 09:46:26 - 2/23/2001 (5371) (0) ● Re: Possible Solution? - Roger Hunter 20:37:53 - 2/22/2001 (5365) (1) ● Large/Small - michael 08:47:57 - 2/23/2001 (5369) (1) ● Re: Large/Small - Roger Hunter 16:39:13 - 2/23/2001 (5381) (0) ● Re: This looks like trash to me (nt) - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 16:07:55 - 2/22/2001 (5353) (0) ● Re: This looks like trash to me (nt) - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 16:07:00 - 2/22/2001 (5352) (1) ● Trash - michael 16:52:29 - 2/22/2001 (5355) (1) ● Re: Trash - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 19:05:32 - 2/22/2001 (5359) (2) ● Re: Trash-not so trashy - Canie 08:17:40 - 2/23/2001 (5367) (1) ● confidence level - michael 09:42:51 - 2/23/2001 (5370) (1) ● Confidence level - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 21:11:37 - 2/23/2001 (5389) (0) ● Agree - michael 19:23:27 - 2/22/2001 (5360) (0) |
|