Trash
Posted by michael on February 22, 2001 at 16:52:29:

OK Dennis, now where getting somewhere. I wasn't quite sure how to interpret "It looks like trash".

1. I am working on a column for chance, so be patient. This is a work in progress.

2. The predictors chance of occurance. What does everybody else think of this? I wouldn't look at that as I feel it is irrelevent, but would be happy to add it if Canie adds it to the form.

3. Not sure what to do about that. I feel quality is much more important than quantity. If I make 10 predictions of of a 3+ somewhere in the world over two weeks, I'll be 10 for 10. Counting hits/misses is a pretty useless concept.

4. Jury is still out with regards to comments. Not sure what the board has decided is anything at all.

Thanks for your comments Dennis.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Trash - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  19:05:32 - 2/22/2001  (5359)  (2)
        ● Re: Trash-not so trashy - Canie  08:17:40 - 2/23/2001  (5367)  (1)
           ● confidence level - michael  09:42:51 - 2/23/2001  (5370)  (1)
              ● Confidence level - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  21:11:37 - 2/23/2001  (5389)  (0)
        ● Agree - michael  19:23:27 - 2/22/2001  (5360)  (0)