Re: Analysis of Post 4297
Posted by Michael on January 03, 2001 at 16:25:51:

Your correct Roger, it should be 3 quakes not 4. I went back and looked at what I had done and discovered that even though I had calculated 15 Mi to be 24.15 Km, I had entered it into the query as 24.5 Km., a difference of .35 Km. The difference is a quake on 4/22/1983 which is listed as 24 Km from my Lat/Lon. It's makes it even more of a longshot using this catalog.

Any ideas about which catalog(s) are the most complete?

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Roger Hunter  16:56:09 - 1/3/2001  (4363)  (1)
        ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Michael  17:19:59 - 1/3/2001  (4364)  (1)
           ● Re: Analysis of Post 4297 - Roger Hunter  17:44:21 - 1/3/2001  (4365)  (1)
              ● As a reminder Alan offered to do evaluations - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  20:01:44 - 1/3/2001  (4369)  (1)
                 ● Alan - Michael  23:13:52 - 1/3/2001  (4374)  (1)
                    ● Re: Alan - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  10:19:10 - 1/4/2001  (4378)  (1)
                       ● Question Dennis? - Bob Shannon  06:43:57 - 1/5/2001  (4389)  (1)
                          ● Re: Question Dennis? - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  10:02:43 - 1/5/2001  (4390)  (0)