|
alt.earthquake.predictions |
I would like to announce the creation of a new usenet newsgroup, alt.earthquake.predictions Everyone is invited to participate regardless of your opinion on earthquake prediction. I have emailed google groups to add the group, but having more people submit requests will hopefully get them to add it quicker. If you use a normal news provider, please see the section in the FAQ below on how to request this group to be added to your NSP's groups list. Brian Table of Contents 1.0 - Purpose of alt.earthquake.predictions (AEP) ---------- AEP is for the posting and discussion of earthquake predictions. The Although there are newsgroups where earthquakes are discussed, most A usenet group provides a place for predictions to be posted in a ---------- AEP is not a moderated group. That means no one is censoring your The only way your messages may not be getting posted to AEP is Also, if you are not seeing messages from a particular poster, it may In either case you will have to contact your NSP or ISP to determine ---------- Since AEP is a usenet group and is not moderated, the only rules However, being a usenet group, participants should behave in a manner A good starting point is en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette AEP is a text only newsgroup. NO BINARIES!!! They likely won't get propogated anyway. Post in plain text only!!! Many newsreaders will not interpret HTML ---------- When posting an earthquake prediction it is best to be as precise 4.1 Location There are a several good ways you can state your locations: >Circle - Provide either a lat/lon or other form of precise location >Box - Define a box by giving lat/lon of the center of the box along 4.2 Magnitude Well specified magnitude ranges are very helpful. Typically the 4.3 Time Frame The time frame that the prediction is valid for is very important The time zone should be specified as well. Ideally, the use of UTC 4.4 Examples of Good Predictions >Within 100km Tokyo, magnitude 5 or larger, starting >Box centered on 118 west, 34 north, 1 degree wide, 1.2 degrees tall. 4.5 Examples of Bad Predictions >Big quake in Japan in three days. >Magnitude 10.5 on Ring of Fire >mag 4 Northern California after Nov 3rd ---------- It's always a good idea to post your own results of your prediction Failures ARE NOT a bad thing. ---------- This group is also good for discussion and analysis of earthquake ---------- alt.earthquake.predictions is a properly created newsgroup with a ftp://ftp.isc.org/usenet/control/alt/alt.earthquake.predictions.gz When submitting requests for this newsgroup to be added to your How quickly the group will be added depends on how quickly your ---------- Truly anonymous posting is possible, but the problem is that many However, it is still possible to post somewhat anonymously by simply ---------- Crossposting is discouraged if for no other reason than several news Experience suggests that 5 groups is the generally accepted maximum However, it is recommended that you limit crossposting to no more To maximize the number of people reading your messages, don't crosspost. ----------
Follow Ups: ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 17:25:36 - 9/16/2006 (40584) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Skywise 19:44:18 - 9/16/2006 (40587) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 01:11:42 - 9/17/2006 (40597) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Skywise 18:19:41 - 9/17/2006 (40604) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 00:31:26 - 9/21/2006 (40679) (0) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 14:03:09 - 9/15/2006 (40547) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Skywise 19:56:34 - 9/15/2006 (40554) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 23:30:13 - 9/15/2006 (40561) (0) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Roger Hunter 09:29:18 - 9/15/2006 (40543) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 14:20:57 - 9/15/2006 (40548) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 14:43:36 - 9/15/2006 (40549) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Skywise 20:06:46 - 9/15/2006 (40555) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Roger Hunter 20:28:43 - 9/15/2006 (40556) (2) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Skywise 22:18:30 - 9/15/2006 (40559) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Roger Hunter 22:32:14 - 9/15/2006 (40560) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 23:54:13 - 9/15/2006 (40562) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Roger Hunter 07:57:48 - 9/16/2006 (40570) (2) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 12:51:27 - 9/16/2006 (40573) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Roger Hunter 13:31:40 - 9/16/2006 (40575) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 13:52:27 - 9/16/2006 (40577) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Roger Hunter 14:19:21 - 9/16/2006 (40578) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 15:37:24 - 9/16/2006 (40579) (0) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Roger Hunter 08:01:16 - 9/16/2006 (40571) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 12:54:35 - 9/16/2006 (40574) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 17:34:21 - 9/16/2006 (40585) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 21:10:06 - 9/16/2006 (40589) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 06:59:09 - 9/17/2006 (40599) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 00:45:08 - 9/18/2006 (40607) (0) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Skywise 22:17:24 - 9/15/2006 (40558) (1) ● Re: alt.earthquake.predictions - Cathryn 23:57:57 - 9/15/2006 (40563) (0) |
|