|
|
|
|
| That is my question |
Hi Cathryn, I was hoping maybe Roger or JV could answer the version question. I see that these baby quakes are reviewed. Maybe it is just standard procedure. Ofcourse any quake just north of Anza peaks my interest. Glen Follow Ups: ● Nobody here qualified to answer - Glen 20:47:08 - 7/28/2006 (39682) (0) ● Re: That is my question - Robert Baum 14:40:22 - 7/27/2006 (39651) (1) ● Re: That is my question - Cathryn 15:20:46 - 7/27/2006 (39652) (3) ● Re: That is my question - Robert Baum 23:08:35 - 7/27/2006 (39671) (0) ● Re: That is my question - Robert Baum 17:45:38 - 7/27/2006 (39662) (0) ● Re: That is my question - Robert Baum 16:48:14 - 7/27/2006 (39656) (1) ● Re: That is my question - Cathryn 17:12:56 - 7/27/2006 (39661) (1) ● Robert - Cathryn 19:31:47 - 7/27/2006 (39664) (1) ● Re: Robert - Robert Baum 20:13:59 - 7/27/2006 (39665) (1) ● Re: Robert - Skywise 22:00:06 - 7/27/2006 (39668) (2) ● Re: Robert - Canie 07:34:15 - 7/29/2006 (39689) (0) ● Re: Robert - Robert Baum 23:22:52 - 7/27/2006 (39672) (1) ● Re: Robert - Cathryn 00:45:00 - 7/28/2006 (39674) (1) ● Re: Robert - Skywise 15:18:10 - 7/28/2006 (39677) (1) ● L for local - John Vidale 16:15:45 - 7/28/2006 (39678) (1) ● Re: L for local - Skywise 19:49:18 - 7/28/2006 (39680) (1) ● Exactly my question, Brian - Glen 20:55:13 - 7/28/2006 (39683) (1) ● mysterious - John Vidale 21:41:19 - 7/28/2006 (39684) (1) ● Next week maybe.. - Glen 00:14:52 - 7/29/2006 (39685) (0) ● Re: That is my question - Canie 13:08:10 - 7/27/2006 (39649) (1) ● Re: That is my question - Cathryn 15:22:02 - 7/27/2006 (39653) (1) ● Already in the "L" stage - Glen 23:03:19 - 7/27/2006 (39670) (1) ● Re: Already in the "L" stage - Cathryn 00:39:33 - 7/28/2006 (39673) (0) |
|
|
|
|
