Re: Let's get back to earthquakes
Posted by Roger Hunter on June 18, 2006 at 09:12:43:


Hi Barbara;

Let's try this again. Bifocals are a real handicap when
the screen is above eye level.


F............N.............F.............N.............
...Q.......Q........Q........Q.......Q..............Q..

F............N.............F.............N.............
.Q...........Q...........Q..........Q.........Q........

F............N.............F.............N.............
...Q........Q........Q.........Q...........Q........Q..

F............N.............F.............N.............
....Q.......Q......Q......Q......Q..........Q..........

Now the 9 hits for 5 day windows include the smaller ones
as they should.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - marc / berkeley  13:59:20 - 6/18/2006  (38466)  (1)
        ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter  14:21:55 - 6/18/2006  (38470)  (1)
           ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - marc / berkeley  14:34:32 - 6/18/2006  (38472)  (1)
              ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter  14:51:27 - 6/18/2006  (38473)  (1)
                 ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - marc / berkeley  11:36:33 - 6/19/2006  (38520)  (1)
                    ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter  12:31:50 - 6/19/2006  (38524)  (0)
     ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Barbara  10:41:09 - 6/18/2006  (38452)  (1)
        ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter  14:24:14 - 6/18/2006  (38471)  (0)
     ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Russell  10:20:24 - 6/18/2006  (38450)  (1)
        ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter  10:39:44 - 6/18/2006  (38451)  (1)
           ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Russell  11:04:55 - 6/18/2006  (38455)  (0)