|
|
|
|
| Re: Let's get back to earthquakes |
Roger- You are stating that because the miss total is not included that it is an incomplete prediction? --Marc Follow Ups: ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter 14:21:55 - 6/18/2006 (38470) (1) ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - marc / berkeley 14:34:32 - 6/18/2006 (38472) (1) ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter 14:51:27 - 6/18/2006 (38473) (1) ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - marc / berkeley 11:36:33 - 6/19/2006 (38520) (1) ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter 12:31:50 - 6/19/2006 (38524) (0) |
|
|
|
|
