Re: GFPM!
Posted by Todd on June 03, 2006 at 16:57:31:

I agree with all the above except for the Newport Inglewood. I don't THINK its too much of a threat. It only has a .6 slip rate through greater LA and has traces they can't even properly detect. I get the feeling the 33 Long Beach quake was more of a random event than a reoccuring consistent deal.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: GFPM! - Joan Chesleigh-Blaine  20:51:52 - 6/3/2006  (37792)  (1)
        ● Re: GFPM! - Cathryn  21:56:31 - 6/3/2006  (37797)  (3)
           ● Re: GFPM! - Mary Antonelli  16:44:32 - 6/4/2006  (37867)  (0)
           ● Re: GFPM! - Joan Chesleigh-Blaine  22:19:05 - 6/3/2006  (37802)  (1)
              ● Re: GFPM! - Cathryn  23:23:38 - 6/3/2006  (37813)  (1)
                 ● Re: GFPM! - Joan Chesleigh-Blaine  00:11:10 - 6/4/2006  (37826)  (1)
                    ● Re: GFPM! - Cathryn  01:01:38 - 6/4/2006  (37837)  (1)
                       ● Re: GFPM! - Canie  22:11:23 - 6/7/2006  (38016)  (1)
                          ● Re: GFPM! - Cathryn  00:57:03 - 6/8/2006  (38031)  (0)
           ● Re: GFPM! - Joan Chesleigh-Blaine  22:14:24 - 6/3/2006  (37800)  (0)