Brian...sure, do special post discussing background of project. Do what you want on the predictions...Canie runs the show...but I'll make the following suggestion anyway: If there are 11 predictions/day there is no way I, by causal observation, will be able to keep track of whether there is anything to it or not...I'd just have to look at Roger's evaluation. If you do do 11 predictions/day, do them in a single thread (Canie says 11 posts, but can be single thread). Otherwise, you could, for example, only post here predictions that stand out...that they are predictions for large enough magnitude quakes that we can have a feel for whether there is anything to it..I think you said Roger is evaluating your full prediction record from your site, so is not required to put them all here. "Large enough magnitude" depends on location...most people here are most familiar with California...but any quake >M4 in the 48 states would stand out. M3s in the Aleutians would not..
On the other hand, you may choose to put all your predictions here if there is some question about the integrity of your site and you are trying to develop a prediction record...in that Canie has control of this site and you do not, and some of us (including me) have asked that posts of this type not be removed or modified. 11/day is OK if you are the only one doing it, but if 10 people were to do it, the board would be less interesting to me because the signal to noise would fall.
Chris