Three questions
Posted by Cathryn on July 15, 2000 at 01:40:06:

First, thanks Petra for asking such an interesting question. Second, thanks Don for supplying such great research.

Now, to my questions:

1) Don, why did your data end in Feb., 1994? Is there no more current data to be found?

2) Why are places that experienced a large earthquake more likely than less to have another large EQ within the next two years? I would assume the opposite; that because of the release of stress from the first large EQ, the odds of a second one in the same area would go down, not up.

On the other hand, after observing EQ patterns for a year and a half (not exactly a long time, especially geologically speaking), I've noticed this very phenomenon. I just don't understand it.

3) How can a geomagnetic storm that occurs several days AFTER a large EQ be linked to it statistically? I thought these solar flares were considered precursors, often with a few days delay, as is the case of eclipses. (Witness Turkey.)

If any of you have answers to these questions, I'd love to hear them.

Thanks,

Cathryn


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Three questions - Don in Hollister  03:43:50 - 7/15/2000  (3263)  (1)
        ● Re: Three questions - Cathryn  05:57:18 - 7/15/2000  (3264)  (1)
           ● Re: Three questions - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  09:07:34 - 7/15/2000  (3265)  (1)
              ● Re: Three questions/CA EQ History - Petra Challus  16:21:53 - 7/15/2000  (3267)  (1)
                 ● Looking for patterns - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  20:49:00 - 7/15/2000  (3268)  (2)
                    ● URL for Seismic/Eruption program - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  08:12:00 - 7/16/2000  (3272)  (0)
                    ● Re: Looking for patterns - Cathryn  21:17:42 - 7/15/2000  (3270)  (1)
                       ● Re: Looking for patterns - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  07:59:43 - 7/16/2000  (3271)  (0)