Re: California quiet - Don or Roger
Posted by Petra on December 13, 2005 at 05:49:39:

Don or Roger,

If time permits, please run some catalogs for CA as follows so we can see how much earthquake activity has increased. I think it might prove revealing for everyone....Petra

Please don't post the catalogs themselves, but provide the numbers.

2003: 3's, 4's, 5's, 6's.
2004: Ditto
2005: Ditto

* I think the 7.+ quake off of the North Coast can be omitted because it's so far out there, it might as well be in it's own country.

Thank You.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: California quiet - Don or Roger - Roger Hunter  13:26:54 - 12/13/2005  (31955)  (2)
        ● 5.0 quakes in 2005 - Barbara  19:57:56 - 12/13/2005  (31960)  (1)
           ● Re: 5.0 quakes in 2005 - Roger Hunter  21:54:49 - 12/13/2005  (31965)  (0)
        ● Re: California quiet - Don or Roger - Barbara  17:52:17 - 12/13/2005  (31957)  (1)
           ● Re: California quiet - Don or Roger - Roger Hunter  21:51:53 - 12/13/2005  (31962)  (1)
              ● includes aftershocks - chris in suburbia  03:22:53 - 12/14/2005  (31967)  (1)
                 ● Re: includes aftershocks - Roger Hunter  09:37:12 - 12/14/2005  (31968)  (1)
                    ● Re: includes aftershocks 2003/2004 too - Petra  20:13:12 - 12/14/2005  (32000)  (0)
     ● Re: California quiet - Don or Roger - chris in suburbia  10:50:08 - 12/13/2005  (31929)  (1)
        ● Boron 3.7...foreshock? - chris in suburbia  13:16:59 - 12/13/2005  (31954)  (1)
           ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - Don in Hollister  15:08:23 - 12/13/2005  (31956)  (1)
              ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - Canie   19:14:52 - 12/13/2005  (31958)  (1)
                 ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - Byron  15:48:32 - 12/14/2005  (31998)  (1)
                    ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - Byron  15:51:50 - 12/14/2005  (31999)  (1)
                       ● Re: Boron 3.7...foreshock? - chris in suburbia  05:12:36 - 12/15/2005  (32003)  (0)