I appreciate Roger's unbiased view of the case. As he says none can reliably evaluate predictions that have an inconsistent or unavailable character as is the case here. Lets leave money aside at this point, the case is purely scientific and there is a scientific basis behind the VAN theory, however the misuse of scientific knowledge and authority is what has put VAN in the dungeon and mostly responsible are the VAN team members that repeatedly refuse cooperation-colaboration by other scientists that question the method. Open up the knowledge to all, it's the only way for progress.
Best
Gerry