Re: science or prediction posts should not be removed
Posted by glen on November 06, 2005 at 20:54:55:

Chris and All..

I like this. The predictor should open up to full questioning about success or failure...

http://www.earthwaves.org/cgi/find.cgi

Follow Ups:
     ● How did you DO that??? - Roger Hunter  21:27:59 - 11/6/2005  (30147)  (1)
        ● Not What I Meant, Roger - glen  10:55:50 - 11/7/2005  (30158)  (2)
           ● Re: Posting URLs - Canie  16:29:20 - 11/7/2005  (30168)  (1)
              ● Thanks Canie! nt - glen  21:38:02 - 11/7/2005  (30174)  (0)
           ● Re: Not What I Meant, Roger - marc / berkeley  12:04:32 - 11/7/2005  (30160)  (1)
              ● Re: Not What I Meant, Roger - glen  14:20:16 - 11/7/2005  (30166)  (1)
                 ● Re: kidding, but Roger may shed some light here - marc / berkeley  09:28:04 - 11/8/2005  (30183)  (1)
                    ● Re: kidding, but Roger may shed some light here - Roger Hunter  12:32:54 - 11/8/2005  (30185)  (0)
     ● Re: science or prediction posts should not be removed - Don in Hollister  21:09:20 - 11/6/2005  (30146)  (2)
        ● Re: science or prediction posts should not be removed - glen  10:43:26 - 11/7/2005  (30156)  (1)
           ● Re: science or prediction posts should not be removed - Michael Tolchard  20:51:45 - 11/8/2005  (30199)  (0)
        ● Re: science or prediction posts should not be removed - marc / berkeley  08:12:49 - 11/7/2005  (30154)  (0)