Re: Not What I Meant, Roger
Posted by marc / berkeley on November 07, 2005 at 12:04:32:

scientific mocking? ( it sounds fun in a way, but it could seem a tad...mean. )

I wonder if we should have a scale:

100% ( our idol! )
90% ( scary! )
80% ( uncanny! )
70% ( amazing! )
60% ( significant )
50% ( praiseworthy)
40% ( noteworthy )
30% ( average )
20% ( laughable )
10% ( pitiful )
0% ( crushing )

I'm probably at average, myself....

( i dunno if this is the best path tho. )


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Not What I Meant, Roger - glen  14:20:16 - 11/7/2005  (30166)  (1)
        ● Re: kidding, but Roger may shed some light here - marc / berkeley  09:28:04 - 11/8/2005  (30183)  (1)
           ● Re: kidding, but Roger may shed some light here - Roger Hunter  12:32:54 - 11/8/2005  (30185)  (0)