|
Re: Not What I Meant, Roger |
Marc, I am not sure just how it should be rated. There are a lot of ideas about how to do that. The simplest is pass/fail, which I find a bit severe for localized conditions. In the case of a six month forecast/projection/prediction absolutely. Getting a 6.8 Mw in Alaska over six months does not fulfill the projection, period. Close, but no cigar. I can not accept mr rabbits one week regime, because it does not give the predictor more space for larger events. I still agree with Don, that the "big one" will hit California in a time and a place that nobody rationally predicts. Unless it is Jody, or Stan Deyo, who predict the whole world all the time... glen Follow Ups: ● Re: kidding, but Roger may shed some light here - marc / berkeley 09:28:04 - 11/8/2005 (30183) (1) ● Re: kidding, but Roger may shed some light here - Roger Hunter 12:32:54 - 11/8/2005 (30185) (0) |
|