|
Re: I agree. |
mrrabbit; Good idea but why impose conditions on the predictors? One should be able to use any size window, any date range any mag. range, circles or squares, whatever. Unfortunately, I haven't found an easy way to tell if a quake is inside an irregular polygon. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: I agree. - mrrabbit 15:37:22 - 11/5/2005 (30097) (1) ● yes but... - Roger Hunter 16:10:09 - 11/5/2005 (30098) (1) ● don't give up so quickly... - mrrabbit 16:45:05 - 11/5/2005 (30099) (1) ● Re: don't give up so quickly... - Roger Hunter 17:07:51 - 11/5/2005 (30100) (1) ● Re: don't give up so quickly... - mrrabbit 22:44:21 - 11/5/2005 (30109) (4) ● Re: don't give up so quickly... - mrrabbit 19:35:51 - 11/6/2005 (30140) (1) ● Re: don't give up so quickly... - Roger Hunter 21:08:42 - 11/6/2005 (30145) (0) ● Re: don't give up so quickly... - Roger Hunter 06:03:12 - 11/6/2005 (30114) (0) ● Re: don't give up so quickly... - Don in Hollister 02:36:57 - 11/6/2005 (30112) (0) ● Re: don't give up so quickly... - Petra 00:15:12 - 11/6/2005 (30111) (1) ● Don, Petra, some clarification - Roger Hunter 05:47:49 - 11/6/2005 (30113) (1) ● Re: Don, Petra, some clarification - Don in Hollister 13:29:41 - 11/6/2005 (30131) (0) |
|