|
Re: dead flat calm |
Hi Chris. Dead calm, or raging seas it really doesn’t matter. I get seasick. Put me in a plane in the middle of a storm and I don’t think a thing about it. Piece of cake. Could you give me the location of the fault you’re going to be looking at, or what ever it is that you’re going to be doing. I would like to get a location of it on my map. 100Km isn’t a back breaker, but you can get a quake up to about M7.5 on it. That is if it waited long enough. More likely in the M=6.0+ range. Take Care…Don in creepy town Follow Ups: ● realtime science..active fault - chris in suburbia 17:25:37 - 8/26/2005 (27744) (2) ● Re: realtime science..active fault - Canie 21:47:14 - 8/26/2005 (27749) (0) ● Re: realtime science..active fault - Don in Hollister 18:10:01 - 8/26/2005 (27745) (1) ● The fault vs the oil tanker - chris in suburbia 23:07:58 - 8/26/2005 (27750) (1) ● Re: The fault vs the oil tanker - Don in Hollister 02:54:48 - 8/27/2005 (27754) (1) ● M7 in 1927 - chris in suburbia 18:14:14 - 8/27/2005 (27771) (1) ● Re: M7 in 1927 - Don in Hollister 19:12:11 - 8/27/2005 (27773) (1) ● Re: M7 in 1927 - Canie 20:21:00 - 8/27/2005 (27774) (1) ● Re: M7 in 1927 - Don in Hollister 23:00:38 - 8/27/2005 (27777) (1) ● paleoseismology with cores - chris in suburbia 09:57:58 - 8/28/2005 (27790) (1) ● Re: paleoseismology with cores - Don in Hollister 17:44:17 - 8/28/2005 (27830) (0) |
|