Re: dead flat calm
Posted by Don in Hollister on August 26, 2005 at 00:18:29:

Hi Chris. Dead calm, or raging seas it really doesn’t matter. I get seasick. Put me in a plane in the middle of a storm and I don’t think a thing about it. Piece of cake.

Could you give me the location of the fault you’re going to be looking at, or what ever it is that you’re going to be doing. I would like to get a location of it on my map. 100Km isn’t a back breaker, but you can get a quake up to about M7.5 on it. That is if it waited long enough. More likely in the M=6.0+ range. Take Care…Don in creepy town


Follow Ups:
     ● realtime science..active fault - chris in suburbia  17:25:37 - 8/26/2005  (27744)  (2)
        ● Re: realtime science..active fault - Canie  21:47:14 - 8/26/2005  (27749)  (0)
        ● Re: realtime science..active fault - Don in Hollister  18:10:01 - 8/26/2005  (27745)  (1)
           ● The fault vs the oil tanker - chris in suburbia  23:07:58 - 8/26/2005  (27750)  (1)
              ● Re: The fault vs the oil tanker - Don in Hollister  02:54:48 - 8/27/2005  (27754)  (1)
                 ● M7 in 1927 - chris in suburbia  18:14:14 - 8/27/2005  (27771)  (1)
                    ● Re: M7 in 1927 - Don in Hollister  19:12:11 - 8/27/2005  (27773)  (1)
                       ● Re: M7 in 1927 - Canie  20:21:00 - 8/27/2005  (27774)  (1)
                          ● Re: M7 in 1927 - Don in Hollister  23:00:38 - 8/27/2005  (27777)  (1)
                             ● paleoseismology with cores - chris in suburbia  09:57:58 - 8/28/2005  (27790)  (1)
                                ● Re: paleoseismology with cores - Don in Hollister  17:44:17 - 8/28/2005  (27830)  (0)