GPS Reading Question - John and Chris
Posted by Petra on June 04, 2005 at 16:54:50:

Here's the link the GPS station (Northbay) which sits along the Rodgers Creek Fault covering the time period from 1999 to 2003. I want to confirm that I am reading the graph correctly. Is it saying that the area being monitored is moving at 23mm a year north? If so, how does that compare generally to other larger faults like segments of the SAF for instance?

Though this data only goes to 2003 I think it would be safe to say that whatever happened after that time has not diminished the experts opinions that it is ready to go.

Did either of you notice to two micro-quakes in the middle of San Francisco Bay today. This is the exact spot which concerns local seismologists and where they think its possible to have a 7.4 and suggest it would probably trigger both the Rodgers Creek and Hayward Faults.

Petra

Follow Ups:
     ● looks as expected to me - John Vidale  18:33:31 - 6/4/2005  (26257)  (2)
        ● Re: looks as expected to me - chris in suburbia  05:37:12 - 6/5/2005  (26263)  (1)
           ● Re: looks as expected to me - Canie  09:59:34 - 6/6/2005  (26278)  (1)
              ● Re: looks as expected to me - Canie  10:07:58 - 6/6/2005  (26279)  (1)
                 ● GPS-relative - chris in suburbia  04:27:46 - 6/7/2005  (26282)  (1)
                    ● Re: GPS-relative - Canie  13:59:53 - 6/7/2005  (26286)  (1)
                       ● Islands rising - chris in suburbia  16:36:17 - 6/8/2005  (26299)  (0)
        ● Re: looks as expected to me, thanks - Petra  18:50:53 - 6/4/2005  (26258)  (0)