|
You Hit The Nail On The Head |
Hi Chris. You have hit the nail right on the head. EQF is making claims for which he/she has never shown any proof of being able to do as he/she claims. Proof. That is all I'm asking for. Nothing more, nothing less. This bit about not wanting to start a panic just doesn't wash. If anyone truly wants to warn people then how are you going to do it without telling them? No self-respecting Government is going to accept a prediction from someone who doesn't have a documented track record of quake prediction. They aren't going to accept any program without first seeing that it works. They aren't going to spend time and effort on something that has never been proven to work. They have to see how many predictions were made. How many of those were correct, how many were wrong, and how many were close, etc. I would be the first to applaud him, even do hand stands despite the fact that I would probably break my neck doing it. I have repeatedly asked him to explain to me how his program works. To date he has never done this. Why? If he wants to be believed then he is going to have to be up front with his claims. He is going to have to prove them. There is only one kind of proof that is acceptable. He is going to have to make his predictions and let the facts fall where they may. He is going to have to let the record speak for it self. No one is going to give him the time of day until as such time he does this. Take Care…Don in creepy town Follow Ups: ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - Cathryn 13:43:09 - 8/9/2004 (22394) (1) ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - EQF 14:48:02 - 8/9/2004 (22400) (1) ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - Cathryn 16:18:19 - 8/9/2004 (22401) (1) ● A past prediction - EQF 16:34:04 - 8/9/2004 (22402) (8) ● A past prediction - Roger Hunter 21:52:33 - 8/9/2004 (22421) (0) ● How about your prediction 7 months later? - John Vidale 19:04:02 - 8/9/2004 (22417) (0) ● How about your prediction 6 months later? - John Vidale 18:58:10 - 8/9/2004 (22415) (0) ● How about your prediction 3 months earlier? - John Vidale 18:40:51 - 8/9/2004 (22413) (0) ● How about your prediction 2 months earlier? - John Vidale 18:31:42 - 8/9/2004 (22411) (2) ● Re: How about the most recent one? - Don in Hollister 21:08:43 - 8/9/2004 (22419) (0) ● Re: How about your prediction 2 months earlier? - Cathryn 18:59:27 - 8/9/2004 (22416) (0) ● Re: A past prediction - Cathryn 17:14:09 - 8/9/2004 (22405) (0) ● that prediction missed, and didn't use orbital data - John Vidale 17:03:02 - 8/9/2004 (22404) (2) ● Willing to play devil's advocate - Cathryn 17:59:43 - 8/9/2004 (22409) (0) ● Re: that prediction missed, and didn't use orbital data - Cathryn 17:36:23 - 8/9/2004 (22406) (1) ● google "groups" - John Vidale 17:44:49 - 8/9/2004 (22407) (1) ● I meant button, of course (nm) - John Vidale 17:45:51 - 8/9/2004 (22408) (1) ● Re: I meant button, of course (nm) - Cathryn 18:38:02 - 8/9/2004 (22412) (0) ● Re: A past prediction - Cathryn 16:53:10 - 8/9/2004 (22403) (1) ● Re: A past prediction - EQF 23:49:03 - 8/9/2004 (22422) (0) |
|