Re: EQF's prediction program
Posted by EQF on July 17, 2004 at 10:08:55:

Hi Roger,

There is another 50% of the picture which needs to be considered in such a discussion. And it is actually the more important part of the picture.

The EM signals that I am working with are usually indicating that a fault zone somewhere around the world near a populated area is getting ready to fracture. That could happen within a few days. Or it might take a few weeks or even a few months depending upon conditions related to the fault zone environment such as the type of fault etc.

So, now there is a signal which says that a significant earthquake is about to occur. And the main question then is, “Where is the fault zone located?”

What my computer program says is, “At the time that the signal was detected, the following fault zones had sun and moon gravity force related strain on them which could trigger an earthquake if the fault zone were about to fracture anyway.”

You could also use multiple radio signal detectors and the triangulation process to determine where the fault zone was located. Earthquake forecasters in China are doing that. And if done correctly such a procedure probably produces better results. You know exactly where the fault zone is located. But I do not have a lab filled with detectors like that. So I developed that computer program. It can produce excellent results with some earthquakes. There is unlimited room for improvement. And it is especially attractive because it doesn’t cost anything. All you need is a computer. And many people already have one.

Finally, one might ask, “How can those signals be selective for earthquakes which will occur near populated areas?” Present theories propose that all the electric power lines and metal water pipes etc. near populated areas are acting as antennas for that particular type of radio wave. Earthquakes in remote areas have no nearby antennas. And so the signals are not active there. Exactly what is taking place could be determined fairly easily. I know for a fact that the signals can be easily reproduced in a laboratory. But I have never been able to find any scientific groups interested in studying that phenomenon.


Follow Ups:
     ● EQF's prediction program - Roger Hunter  11:57:47 - 7/17/2004  (22178)  (1)
        ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF  01:33:50 - 7/18/2004  (22181)  (0)